Faced with a new Department of Defense press policy, journalists from nearly every major US news organization refused to sign and surrendered their Pentagon credentials. A federal court later found the policy unconstitutional.

Esta página aún no está disponible en español. Está leyendo la versión en inglés. Ver en inglés

The Department of Defense issued a press policy in autumn 2025 conditioning Pentagon credentials on agreement to new restrictions on reporting and movement within the building.

At the 15 October 2025 deadline, journalists from nearly every major US news organization — including the broadcast networks, the wire services, the national newspapers, and outlets across the political spectrum such as Fox News and Newsmax — declined to sign and turned in their badges. Of the more than 100 people who cover the Pentagon, about 15 had signed by the deadline. On 22 October the department announced a replacement press corps: spokesman Sean Parnell said more than 60 journalists had agreed to the policy, 26 of them previously credentialed. Among the new signers were The Gateway Pundit, The National Pulse, Human Events, Just the News, Frontlines by Turning Point USA, LindellTV and the podcaster Tim Pool.

On 4 December 2025 the New York Times Company and its intelligence reporter Julian E. Barnes sued the department, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Parnell. In March 2026 a federal judge granted the plaintiffs summary judgment, holding the policy unconstitutional; the government appealed.

Fuentes

  1. 01.

    United States Department of Defense. Updated Physical Control Measures for Press/Media Access Within the Pentagon. (2025). The 23 May 2025 memo restricting unescorted press access and signalling tighter credentialing, which preceded the October policy.

  2. 02.

    United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Docket, New York Times Company v. Department of Defense, No. 1:25-cv-04218 (D.D.C.). (2026). Suit filed 4 December 2025; year reflects the docket's most recent major action. Judge Paul L. Friedman granted the plaintiffs summary judgment on 20 March 2026, holding the press policy unconstitutional; the government appealed to the D.C. Circuit.

  3. 03.

    The Washington Post. More than 100 people cover the Pentagon. Only 15 signed its new press policy.. (2025). Source for the scale of the refusal and for the composition of the small group that did sign.

  4. 04.

    Barr, J. (2025). Pentagon press reporting policy. The Guardian. Same-day account of reporters vacating the Pentagon press room at the 15 October deadline.

  5. 05.

    Associated Press. After others departed, Pentagon announces 'new' press corps filled with conservative news outlets. (2025). Source for Fox News and Newsmax being among the outlets that rejected the policy and departed, and for the 22 October replacement press corps: Sean Parnell's count of more than 60 signers including 26 previously credentialed journalists, and the named outlets. The headline's characterization of the new outlets is the wire service's, not this entry's.

  6. 06.

    Fox News. New York Times sues Pentagon over its new press policy, says it violates First, Fifth Amendment rights. (2025). Source for the 4 December 2025 filing date and for the named parties: the Times and its intelligence reporter Julian Barnes as plaintiffs, with Hegseth and Parnell among the defendants.

Cronología

Timeline view for this event will display chronological context and related events.

October 15, 2025
Pentagon press corps turns in credentials over new access policy
Context
Related events and background

Grafo de Red

Network visualization showing connections between this event and related entities.

Este sitio está en desarrollo activo. El contenido y las funciones pueden cambiar.