← Back to Anti-Vax Movement
Movements movements/anti-vax

Page history

Every change to the Anti-Vax Movement page: what changed, when it went live, and how it was reviewed.

Changes across the whole site →

1 open item — needs research

Vague, unquantified causal claim. While vaccine hesitancy is documented to correlate with lower vaccination rates in some communities, this statement presents it as a settled, direct effect without citing specific data, regions, or studies.

Flagged by the review on Aug 12, 2026; open for 78 days as of Oct 29, 2026.

See the finding

Lifecycle

Sep 19, 2025 – today · select a mark to jump to it
  • Writing
  • AI review
  • Fixes
  • Minor upkeep

Changes

  1. Edit

    Edited: Connections removed

    Connections removed
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
  2. Edit

    Edited: 3 sources added, 3 sections added

    3 sources added3 sections added · 3 removedDescription changedKey tactics changedConnections changedFounded removed+286 / −232 words
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
    Show changesHide changes

    BeforeThe anti-vaccine movement is a health-related digital political movement that uses social media platforms to challenge public health policies and vaccine mandates. ## Movement Evolution **1990s-2000s: Early Formation** The modern movement began with concerns about the MMR vaccine and autism, spreading through early internet forums and alternative health websites. **2000s-2010s: Social Media Expansion** Facebook groups and YouTube channels became primary organizing spaces, sharing personal testimonies and alternative health information. **2020-2021: COVID-19 Mainstream Integration** The …

    AfterOpposition to vaccination is much older than the internet. What this page records is the movement's modern form, which is bound up with one paper and its retraction. ## The 1998 paper and its retraction In 1998 *The Lancet* published a paper by Wakefield and colleagues that was taken as raising a link between the MMR vaccine and developmental disorder. In 2010 *The Lancet* retracted it. The retraction notice is a separate published document with its own DOI, and both are cited above so that the paper cannot be found through this page without its retraction attached. The retraction did not …

  3. MinorMinor edit · Image changed

  4. MinorMinor edit · Image changed

  5. AI review Review 1 of 1

    Reviewed: 14 findings — 10 fixed, 3 dismissed, 1 open

    Factual accuracy 5Bias 4Tone 5
    Reviewed by
    Not recorded
    Why it ran
    Not recorded
    Text changed
    +7 / −11 words
    Show changes Hide changes
    Bias

    Before “"coordinated harassment"”

    After “"coordinated online campaigns"”

    Why: Listed as a factual 'key tactic' without hedging, attribution, or supporting detail elsewhere in the article. This is a serious, loaded accusation presented as established fact rather than a documented/sourced characterization, which is inconsistent with the neutral, factual tone required for movement pages.

    Bias

    Before “"scientific misinformation campaigns"”

    After “"promotion of disputed vaccine-safety claims"”

    Why: Frames the movement's activity with a loaded, conclusory label ('misinformation campaigns') in the key facts list rather than a neutral, descriptive characterization of tactics (e.g., 'promotion of vaccine-safety claims'). Presented unqualified as fact rather than framed as a widely-documented characterization.

    See all 14 findings in the review report
    Full review report
  6. MinorMinor edit · Image changed

  7. MinorMinor edit · Image changed

  8. MinorMinor edit · Image added

  9. MinorMinor edit · Wikipedia link added

  10. Page created

    First version

    270 words
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
This site is under active development. Content and features may change.