← Back to Dobbs v. Jackson overturns Roe v. Wade
Timeline timeline/2022-06-24-dobbs-v-jackson-overturns-roe-v-wade

Page history

Every change to the Dobbs v. Jackson overturns Roe v. Wade page: what changed, when it went live, and how it was reviewed.

Changes across the whole site →

Lifecycle

Sep 16, 2025 – today · select a mark to jump to it
  • Writing
  • AI review
  • Fixes
  • Minor upkeep

Changes

  1. MinorMinor edit · Slug added

  2. AI review Review 3 of 3

    Reviewed: 3 findings, all fixed

    Factual accuracy 1Unsupported claim 1Missing context 1
    Reviewed by
    Not recorded
    Why it ran
    Not recorded
    Show changes Hide changes
    Factual accuracy

    Before “places: - title: "Texas" slug: "texas"”

    Why: Texas has no documented connection to this case or to any claim in the body, and is included with no supporting citation.

    Unsupported claim

    Before “Court returns abortion regulation to the states; telehealth and interstate aid networks organize online.”

    After “By the end of 2024, one in four abortions in the United States were provided via telehealth, and one in seven were provided under state shield laws — statutes that protect clinicians who mail medication abortion to patients in states with bans or telehealth restrictions.”

    Why: Specific post-Dobbs developments asserted with no source; only the slip opinion is cited.

    See all 3 findings in the review report
    Full review report
  3. AI review Review 2 of 3

    Reviewed: 3 findings, all fixed

    Factual accuracy 1Unsupported claim 1Missing context 1
    Reviewed by
    Not recorded
    Why it ran
    Not recorded
    Text changed
    +83 / −7 words
    Show changes Hide changes
    Factual accuracy

    Before “places: - title: "Texas" slug: "texas"”

    Why: Texas has no documented connection to this case or to any claim in the body, and is included with no supporting citation.

    Unsupported claim

    Before “Court returns abortion regulation to the states; telehealth and interstate aid networks organize online.”

    After “By the end of 2024, one in four abortions in the United States were provided via telehealth, and one in seven were provided under state shield laws — statutes that protect clinicians who mail medication abortion to patients in states with bans or telehealth restrictions.”

    Why: Specific post-Dobbs developments asserted with no source; only the slip opinion is cited.

    See all 3 findings in the review report
    Full review report
  4. AI review Review 1 of 3

    Reviewed: 8 findings — 3 fixed, 2 dismissed, 3 open

    Factual accuracy 1Unsupported claim 3Missing context 1Framing imbalance 1Cross reference mismatch 1Content gap 1
    Reviewed by
    Not recorded
    Why it ran
    Not recorded
    Text changed
    +0 / −0 words
    Show changes Hide changes
    Framing imbalance

    Before “Court returns abortion regulation to the states; telehealth and interstate aid networks organize online.”

    After “The Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision holds the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overturning Roe v. Wade and returning abortion regulation to the states.”

    Why: The body text and description both frame Dobbs solely as 'returning abortion regulation to the states,' which is the framing used by the majority opinion and typically favored by pro-life advocates. It omits that the ruling eliminated a previously recognized federal constitutional right (established in Roe and reaffirmed in Casey), which is the framing typically used by pro-choice advocates and legal commentators describing the decision's practical effect. A more neutral rendering would note both that the decision overturned the constitutional right to abortion recognized in Roe/Casey AND that it returned regulatory authority to the states, rather than leading only with the states'-rights framing.

    Unsupported claim

    Before “online organizing around abortion access and interstate aid networks follows”

    After “The Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision holds the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overturning Roe v. Wade and returning abortion regulation to the states.”

    Why: The only source cited is the Supreme Court slip opinion itself, which naturally says nothing about subsequent online organizing, telehealth, or interstate aid networks. The claim that this specific organizing 'follows' the decision is asserted without any citation supporting it.

    See all 8 findings in the review report
    Full review report

  5. MinorMinor edit · Image removed

  6. Edit

    Edited: 1 source added, Description changed

    1 source addedDescription changed+10 / −5 words
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
    Show changesHide changes

    BeforeDigital clinics/abortion access info wars; interstate aid networks online.

    AfterCourt returns abortion regulation to the states; telehealth and interstate aid networks organize online.

  7. MinorMinor edit · Image changed

  8. Edit

    Edited: Places changed, Institutions added

    Places changedInstitutions added
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
  9. Edit

    Edited: Platforms changed, People changed

    Platforms changedPeople changed
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
  10. Edit

    Edited: Categories added

    Categories added
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded

  11. MinorMinor edit · Image added

  12. Edit

    Edited: Description added

    Description addedSlug removed
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
  13. Page created

    First version

    9 words
    Reason
    Not recorded
    Made by
    Not recorded
Spotted an error on this page?
This site is under active development. Content and features may change.