Page created
First version
212 words5 sources
Approved by the maintainer before it went live
Timeline timeline/2026-09-25-new-mexico-jury-finds-facebook-violated-state-consumer-protection-law
Page history
Every change to the New Mexico Jury Finds Facebook Violated State Consumer Protection Law page: what changed, when it went live, and how it was reviewed.
Changes across the whole site →Lifecycle
Oct 19, 2026 – today · select a mark to jump to itChanges
- AI review Review 1 of 1
Reviewed: 8 findings — 5 fixed, 2 dismissed, 1 open
Factual accuracy 1Bias 1Unsupported claim 3Exaggeration 1Broken entity reference 1Cross event numeric consistency 1Approved by the maintainer before it went live
Show changes Hide changes
BiasBefore “political ad targeting, including for Donald Trump's 2016 campaign”
After “that was then used by Cambridge Analytica for political ad targeting.”
Why: The entry singles out Donald Trump's 2016 campaign as the beneficiary of the Cambridge Analytica data, but none of the five cited sources' notes mention Trump or his campaign at all. Cambridge Analytica's political client list in that cycle also included other campaigns and non-US clients; naming only the Trump campaign, unsourced, creates a one-sided partisan association in an entry that is otherwise a neutral consumer-protection/data-privacy story.
Unsupported claimSee all 8 findings in the review reportBefore “that was then used by Cambridge Analytica for political ad targeting, including for Donald Trump's 2016 campaign”
After “that was then used by Cambridge Analytica for political ad targeting.”
Why: None of the five cited sources' notes mention political ad targeting or the Trump 2016 campaign; the notes only support 'the personality-quiz app that harvested data from roughly 87 million profiles for Cambridge Analytica.' This is a specific, politically-charged factual addition with no citation support in the provided source notes.