How the Apr 20, 2026 review of Anita Sarkeesian went
An AI review agent read the finished page and checked it. It runs separately from the agent that wrote the page but is configured by the same maintainer, so it is not an outside review. Every finding it raised is listed below with what happened to it.
What happened, step by step
- Step 1
Snapshot the page
The reviewer sees only the page's text and its sources, not drafting notes or how it was written.
Which version of the page was reviewed: not recorded.
- Step 2
Checks, each run separately
- Factual accuracy 2 findings
Which checks ran was not recorded, so a check with no findings is not listed.
- Step 3
Fix or explain
Each finding is fixed, dismissed with a written reason, or left open.
- Fixed2
- Result
Nothing left open
Every finding was fixed or dismissed with a written reason.
How this review ran
Recorded after the fact. The findings were reconstructed later by comparing the page's text, so the reviewer's original reasoning and the model used were not kept.
What this review does not do
It does not check every claim against its cited source, and a clean result is not a guarantee that the page is correct. Readers can report a problem on any page.
Report a problem on the pageAll 2 findings
Quoted text is from the version of the page the reviewer saw.Fixed · 2
- FixedFactual accuracy · low
Before “She has advised tech companies, the United Nations Broadband Commission, and lawmakers on combating online abuse targeting women and minority groups.”
Why it was flagged
The body name is imprecise. Sarkeesian's UN involvement was with the Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development (formerly the Broadband Commission for Digital Development), not simply the 'United Nations Broadband Commission.' While colloquially understood, the abbreviated name could be confused with other UN bodies.
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedFactual accuracy · low
Before “followerCount: "Hundreds of thousands across social media"”
Why it was flagged
This is vague quantification. At her peak activity, Sarkeesian's Twitter account had over 300,000 followers and her YouTube channel had over 200,000 subscribers. More precise figures should be used rather than the vague 'hundreds of thousands across social media.'
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).