How the Apr 25, 2026 review of David Graeber went
An AI review agent read the finished page and checked it. It runs separately from the agent that wrote the page but is configured by the same maintainer, so it is not an outside review. Every finding it raised is listed below with what happened to it.
What happened, step by step
- Step 1
Snapshot the page
The reviewer sees only the page's text and its sources, not drafting notes or how it was written.
Which version of the page was reviewed: not recorded.
- Step 2
Checks, each run separately
- Factual accuracy 6 findings
- Tone 6 findings
Which checks ran was not recorded, so a check with no findings is not listed.
- Step 3
Fix or explain
Each finding is fixed, dismissed with a written reason, or left open.
- Fixed9
- Open3
- Result
Findings open
The page stays live with its badge showing an open finding. It is reviewed again once the open item is addressed.
How this review ran
Recorded after the fact. The findings were reconstructed later by comparing the page's text, so the reviewer's original reasoning and the model used were not kept.
What this review does not do
It does not check every claim against its cited source, and a clean result is not a guarantee that the page is correct. Readers can report a problem on any page.
Report a problem on the pageAll 12 findings
Quoted text is from the version of the page the reviewer saw.Open · 3
- OpenFactual accuracy · low
“Yale University (1998-2007)”
Why it was flagged
Start date plausible but should be verified
Why it is still open
No reason was recorded.
- OpenFactual accuracy · low
“London School of Economics (2013-2020)”
Why it was flagged
Dates appear correct
Why it is still open
No reason was recorded.
- OpenFactual accuracy · low
“Debt: The First 5,000 Years (2011)”
Why it was flagged
Timeline essentially correct
Why it is still open
No reason was recorded.
Fixed · 9
- FixedFactual accuracy · medium
Before “His contract was not renewed in 2007”
Why it was flagged
Graeber was denied tenure at Yale, not simply a contract non-renewal
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedFactual accuracy · medium
Before “one of the most widely shared political messages in social media history”
Why it was flagged
Unverifiable superlative
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedFactual accuracy · medium
Before “He is credited with helping develop...the We are the 99% framing”
Why it was flagged
Overstates individual role in collaborative coinage
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · high
Before “that became one of the most widely shared political messages in social media history”
Why it was flagged
Unsourced superlative claim
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · medium
Before “The work challenged conventional narratives”
Why it was flagged
Editorializing framing
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · low
Before “shaped the Occupy Wall Street movement”
Why it was flagged
Evaluative verb in description
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · low
Before “bringing scholarly arguments about economic history into mainstream political conversation”
Why it was flagged
Evaluative characterization
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · low
Before “Used accessible writing to translate academic research into public discourse”
Why it was flagged
Value judgment
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).
- FixedTone · low
Before “intellectual contributions and their ongoing relevance”
Why it was flagged
Evaluative terms
What was done
Quote no longer present in the source file (inferred by backfill; original rationale unrecorded).