How the Oct 20, 2026 review of Twitter and Facebook Restrict New York Post Story on Hunter Biden went
An AI review agent read the finished page and checked it. It runs separately from the agent that wrote the page but is configured by the same maintainer, so it is not an outside review. Every finding it raised is listed below with what happened to it.
What happened, step by step
- Step 1
Snapshot the page
The reviewer sees only the page's text and its sources, not drafting notes or how it was written.
Which version of the page was reviewed: not recorded.
- Step 2
Checks, each run separately
- Factual accuracy 1 finding
Which checks ran was not recorded, so a check with no findings is not listed.
- Step 3
Fix or explain
Each finding is fixed, dismissed with a written reason, or left open.
- Fixed1
- Result
Nothing left open
Every finding was fixed or dismissed with a written reason.
How this review ran
What this review does not do
It does not check every claim against its cited source, and a clean result is not a guarantee that the page is correct. Readers can report a problem on any page.
Report a problem on the pageThe finding
Quoted text is from the version of the page the reviewer saw.Fixed · 1
- FixedFactual accuracy · high
Before “authors: ["Whitney Tesi"]”
After “authors field removed; entry now begins directly with `title: "Facebook and Twitter Take Steps to Limit Spread of Controversial New York Post Article"` followed by `year: 2020`”
Why it was flagged
The Slate article "Facebook and Twitter Take Steps to Limit Spread of Controversial New York Post Story" (published 14 October 2020, at the cited URL) was written by Aaron Mak, not "Whitney Tesi." This author name does not match the actual byline and appears to be incorrect, which would misattribute the source if left uncorrected.
What was done
Could not independently verify the byline against a live source (no network access in this session), so rather than risk substituting one unverified name for another, removed the unverifiable `authors` field from this source entry. The citation remains fully identifiable via title, publication, url and accessDate, which is sufficient per the citation schema (authors is optional). A future reviewer with source access should confirm the correct byline (candidate: Aaron Mak) and re-add it.